Checking election 2006 results, one cannot help but do a jaw-dropper on the results of Arizona's anti-gay Proposition 107, the Protect Marriage Arizona amendment, which failed at the ballot box 49% to 51%. (Some votes are still being counted, no change in the outcome is expected.) Once reliably-red Arizona, ground zero in the illegal immigrant-bashing business, supports gay marriage? The very first state in the union to reject an anti-gay marriage initiative? At the same time seven other states approved similar initiatives on the same day? So, Arizona stands alone against 27 other states on this issue? Say what?
Say what, indeed. This is a great story about smart and gutsy progressives, campaign strategy and tactics and sticking to your guns when the national Big Dogs were giving the `local yokels' the Big Crunch over money. Rahm-style arm-twisting. Follow me on the jump and I hope you'll leave with a big smile on your face.
I live in Arizona's Congressional District 1, a sprawling district covering close to half of this state. The registration figures show a split district, with Dems holding a seven-point edge overall. Yet, no Dem has won this district since 1992, when Karan English pulled off a huge upset over Doug Wead (R-Theocrat). I was Karan's pollster and one of her strategy team. I know what it takes to win here.
Today, however, Democrat Ellen Simon is poised to take this district from Rick Renzi (R-Corruption). She is positioned to win, in my view, because she's an excellent candidate and also because of Howard Dean's 50-State Strategy, which BiPM diaried about today. This, my friends, is one of the places where it all comes together for that final Red Zone drive to score the game-winning touchdown. Follow me on the flip and I'll tell you how she scores the TD.
Cross-posted at MyDD.com and DailyKos.com
Last Thursday night I had the opportunity to meet Ned Lamont and talk with him face-to-face and in-depth about his race to unseat Joementum Lieberman. We got down to it, to put it bluntly, no holds barred, and I'm telling you right here and right now Ned should win this race. He deserves our attention and as much support as the netroots can muster. This guy gets it, folks. He can take Joementum out, ridding us of a major embarrassment in the Democratic Party and an unapologetic shill for right-wing extremism. I'll tell you how and why I came to this conclusion below.
This is a long post and a very, very important one. Last time I introduced the psychographics borne out of this poll, a mini-history of the method, and a tree-tops view of the themes and groups in action. This time, we're going to dive deeply into them and go through the demographics and detail relative to specific questions. Next time, I'm going to provide my view of what political communications strategy would look like when based on our findings. Then, the final primary post of this analysis will be my strategic recommendations, including action items. After that, I'll be cleaning up some loose ends, including an experiment designed to test the impact of the OBL tape and probably some detailed pretest/posttest Bush approval analysis.
My goal with this post is for us to more fully understand the groups, on a personal level, so they become familiar to us. I hope you'll be able to recognize real people, friends, neighbors, others, in them, even though we couldn't flesh the groups out more thoroughly this time because of budget and interview time limitations. But, it was the first time out on the MyDD Poll and repeated research will solve that problem nicely, thank you very much. Join me on the flip...
Below are the crosstab tables for your review. Hope you've enjoyed the post and found it useful. Hasta.
<u>Demographics</u>
Heart- Heart-
Blue Urban Pro- land land Trusting Red
US Core Blue gressives Blue Red Boomers Core
Democrat 33% 58% 65% 50% 21% 17% 34% 10%
Republican 29 6 8 16 8 20 38 62
Indep/Other 38 36 27 34 71 63 28 28
Male 47 47 36 47 55 32 30 57
Female 53 53 64 53 45 68 70 43
Northeast 22 21 22 22 27 16 26 21
South 30 22 26 35 24 30 32 36
Midwest 26 24 23 23 34 37 18 26
Rockies 7 10 7 8 5 4 3 7
West Coast 15 22 22 12 10 13 20 10
Urban 27 30 31 37 29 20 16 24
Suburban 35 34 33 38 33 31 40 37
Rural 36 32 33 23 37 48 44 38
35 yrs. or less 14 9 11 22 12 26 6 15
36 to 45 yrs. 15 16 14 9 16 14 14 17
46 to 55 yrs. 23 24 27 24 23 19 28 21
56 to 65 yrs. 21 25 26 13 15 14 20 21
65+ yrs. 27 26 22 32 34 27 31 26
Anglo 80 71 76 60 85 74 86 90
Minority 20 29 24 40 15 26 14 10
Fund/Evan. 23 5 14 10 17 26 33 37
Mainstream 39 30 31 34 49 24 46 47
Liberal 38 65 55 56 34 50 21 16
Less than $25K 26 25 28 49 20 32 25 17
$25K to $49.9K 27 28 23 27 32 33 21 28
$50K to $74.9K 22 24 23 12 16 18 31 26
$75K + 25 23 26 12 32 17 23 29
<u>Terrorism Threat Index and Themes</u>
Terrorism Threat Index:
High Medium Low
US 27% 39% 34%
Blue Core 5 59 37
Urban Blue 78 21 1
Progressives 36 53 11
Heartland Blue 30 57 13
Heartland Red 30 58 12
Trusting Boomers 51 47 2
Red Core 1 25 74
Fear theme:
Fearful Neutral Not fearful
US 40% 19% 41%
Blue Core 9 12 79
Urban Blue 82 14 4
Progressives 53 33 14
Heartland Blue 29 28 43
Heartland Red 61 22 17
Trusting Boomers 92 8 0
Red Core 15 18 67
Bush Meme:
Positive Neutral Negative
US 43% 16% 41%
Blue Core 1 5 94
Urban Blue 13 22 65
Progressives 5 15 80
Heartland Blue 41 29 30
Heartland Red 83 7 10
Trusting Boomers 95 3 2
Red Core 70 16 14
Religious Tolerance theme:
Tolerant Neutral Intolerant
US 27% 42% 31%
Blue Core 41 44 15
Urban Blue 39 32 29
Progressives 40 39 21
Heartland Blue 22 52 26
Heartland Red 33 41 26
Trusting Boomers 17 34 49
Red Core 13 47 40
Bubba theme:
Positive Neutral Negative
US 38% 20% 42%
Blue Core 18 12 70
Urban Blue 5 9 86
Progressives 66 19 15
Heartland Blue 12 12 76
Heartland Red 76 14 10
Trusting Boomers 15 53 32
Red Core 57 29 14
Trust in External Solutions theme:
Trust Neutral Distrust
US 37% 17% 46%
Blue Core 36 16 47
Urban Blue 43 16 41
Progressives 12 11 77
Heartland Blue 8 10 82
Heartland Red 10 19 71
Trusting Boomers 69 9 22
Red Core 54 23 23
<u>Survey Questions:</u>
Direction US is headed:
Right Direction Wrong Track Not Sure
US 37% 48% 15%
Blue Core 13 71 16
Urban Blue 6 86 8
Progressives 11 70 19
Heartland Blue 10 68 22
Heartland Red 51 32 17
Trusting Boomers 45 31 24
Red Core 75 13 12
Pretest Bush job approval:
Approve Disapprove Not Sure
US 43% 50% 7%
Blue Core 6 87 7
Urban Blue 1 94 5
Progressives 9 83 8
Heartland Blue 9 81 10
Heartland Red 77 16 7
Trusting Boomers 66 23 11
Red Core 89 6 5
Availability of good jobs at decent wages:
Widely Available, Available, Not Not
Available not easy rare Available Sure
US 18% 37% 25% 9% 11%
Blue Core 13 37 30 13 7
Urban Blue 7 36 32 18 6
Progressives 3 40 31 10 16
Heartland Blue 9 34 33 11 14
Heartland Red 2 27 37 13 21
Trusting Boomers 25 41 19 5 11
Red Core 35 40 13 3 9
Rating of feds protecting the US since 9/11:
Very
Excellent Good Fair Poor Poor
US 13% 38% 31% 12% 6%
Blue Core 3 25 41 20 11
Urban Blue 1 15 40 25 18
Progressives 2 27 55 15 1
Heartland Blue 3 31 48 13 5
Heartland Red 11 59 23 6 1
Trusting Boomers 12 52 30 5 1
Red Core 32 54 11 2 1
Personal safety/security since 9/11:
A lot safer Safer Neutral Less safe A lot less safe
US 24% 18% 34% 12% 13%
Blue Core 20 21 39 8 12
Urban Blue 5 6 41 21 27
Progressives 7 10 50 20 13
Heartland Blue 16 14 47 15 8
Heartland Red 7 28 38 16 11
Trusting Boomers 11 15 47 9 17
Red Core 49 27 15 5 4
Worry the US will be attacked in the next year:
Not worried Not Extremely
at all worried Neutral Worried worried
US 18% 18% 30% 18% 16%
Blue Core 39 26 28 3 4
Urban Blue 5 3 23 32 37
Progressives 3 10 39 26 21
Heartland Blue 15 22 44 12 7
Heartland Red 6 19 28 25 22
Trusting Boomers 0 3 20 33 44
Red Core 30 27 30 9 5
Worry that Osama bin Laden hasn't been captured:
Not worried Not Extremely
at all worried Neutral Worried worried
US 23% 15% 26% 14% 22%
Blue Core 46 20 23 5 6
Urban Blue 6 6 15 17 56
Progressives 4 13 30 22 32
Heartland Blue 15 18 37 16 13
Heartland Red 1 7 34 29 29
Trusting Boomers 2 1 31 19 47
Red Core 43 22 24 6 5
Has (household) followed DHS recommendations for attack preparation:
Yes, No, Not
followed have not sure
US 34% 61% 5%
Blue Core 36 55 9
Urban Blue 48 49 3
Progressives 17 77 6
Heartland Blue 8 90 2
Heartland Red 7 84 9
Trusting Boomers 64 29 8
Red Core 42 55 3
Confidence in feds' timely, effective response in a disaster:
Highly Not Not confident
confident Confident Neutral confident at all
US 13% 13% 30% 16% 28%
Blue Core 6 7 29 18 41
Urban Blue 2 1 12 17 64
Progressives 11 14 35 19 21
Heartland Blue 3 2 36 25 35
Heartland Red 10 8 46 21 14
Trusting Boomers 8 8 42 17 25
Red Core 26 27 30 10 7
Support for March, 2003 invasion of Iraq:
Strongly Strongly Not
Support Support Oppose Oppose Sure
US 18% 28% 22% 26% 6%
Blue Core 0 5 40 50 5
Urban Blue 2 6 26 63 3
Progressives 1 9 53 32 5
Heartland Blue 3 18 33 36 10
Heartland Red 22 57 12 0 9
Trusting Boomers 31 43 12 5 9
Red Core 42 48 4 1 5
Support for keeping 100K troops in Iraq for at least a year:
Strongly Strongly Not
Support Support Oppose Oppose Sure
US 14% 36% 23% 21% 6%
Blue Core 3 17 33 41 6
Urban Blue 2 18 27 49 4
Progressives 2 15 48 34 1
Heartland Blue 6 26 38 20 10
Heartland Red 13 55 16 6 10
Trusting Boomers 11 73 8 6 2
Red Core 34 49 8 3 6
Support for Murtha's Iraq troop deployment plan:
Strongly Strongly Not
Support Support Oppose Oppose sure
US 10% 47% 20% 14% 9%
Blue Core 2 34 30 23 11
Urban Blue 6 37 25 25 7
Progressives 2 36 32 20 10
Heartland Blue 7 67 9 6 11
Heartland Red 13 66 14 2 4
Trusting Boomers 22 61 5 &
Well, this is a bit of a celebratory day, as the psychographic (extended) analysis of the MyDD Poll begins and I also received Crashing The Gate this morning. What timing! Jerome and Markos featured some of our discussion about psychographic research in The Gravy Train chapter. So the book hits and here at MyDD we're `right in tune' with them, driving the ball down the field a la the West Coast Offense, and already applying some of the knowledge, information and recommendations they've generated in the book. Love it. Karma is on our side, it would seem.
Let's get started. This part of the analysis is the most important, folks. At least in my view. It's the most comprehensive, deep, multi-layered and consistently revealing method of analyzing data because it respects the complexity of humans, highlights it even, and rigorously goes through a dataset looking for embedded patterns of response that are not evident through simple demographic crosstabulation. It's a CAT-scan of the data, basically.
This is a long post, but I truly hope you'll stay with it to the end. In my view, there's plenty of gems in here and we're getting ready to `go at throttle up' on the Analytical Rocket. This post helps you strap into the rocket, I hope.
First, for fun: an observation and conclusion. You know it's going to be a wild political year when all the politicos want briefings `on what's happening out there'. Now, yesterday. Eight months out. Uh-huh. Are we a bit on edge these days, folks? A bit concern-ed? A bit unsure-ed? Natch on that and there you go on my recent and upcoming sched. Briefings, briefings, briefings, at the end of which comes the world-renowned "Hmm. Really? Hmm." That's the take on the current state of blue campaign strategery in this neck of the woods: noodlin', ponderin', chin-rubbin'. Lots of "hmm."
I am sure you get the picture. It's TBD which frame is more apropos for the year, though: a refrain from Country Joe McDonald's Fixin' to Die Rag ("open up the Pearly Gates, there ain't no time to wonder why, whoopee, we're all gonna die!") or from Public Image Ltd.'s Warrior ("I take no quarter. This is my land. I'll never surrender. I am. A Warrior.").
Strategically, from what I've seen, I'd say the Talking Heads' Once in a Lifetime has the point locally and nationally so far in 2006: "same as it ever was" for political communications, folks. Politicos are simply more fidgety this time. Nervous tics, that sort of thing. The poor dumb bastards. I'll definitely return to this issue when we get to the recommendations section of the research, given what we know now and also what I think we'll find in the extended analysis (which I plan to conduct and then present next). And those recommendations are most likely include relentlessly slapping `em all silly. Just so you know. Tough love, you see. Especially since the national blues have that killer-diller Silver Bullet thematic going against the reds: "We can do better." (Sigh.) Jeebus. Jiminy Freaking Christmas, that'll catch fire with voters, don't ya think? Riiiiight.
Next on the analysis agenda, we'll see what the Terrorism Threat Index tells us about responses to impeachment questions and right-wing extremism. Before I do that, though, let me today provide my view of the impeachment questions we asked, primarily because it's such a hot topic right now and there's legitimate discussion about how/what to measure concerning it.
Mystery Pollster has started an excellent discussion on the subject and I think many people will be very interested to check out his comments in Part I (link above) and also when he posts Part II. Me included. His primary points as I see them involve the lack of knowledge of Americans about the process of impeachment and the question as to how best to measure their attitudes now on the subject, a hypothetical outcome in the future. Both excellent issues to discuss in order to generate solid information on the issue.
Which is exactly what we did in the design phase of our poll. And I firmly believe the MyDD Poll has set the standard on impeachment because our questions specifically take into account the impeachment process and ask relevant questions Americans can reasonably respond to now. And in the future.
· IA: Grassley and Christian conservatives at odds (desmoinesdem)
· Richardson tells McCain to stop whining (fbihop)
· OR-SEN: New DSCC/IE ad in Oregon (karichisholm)
· NM Dems GET the netroots; GOP not so much (fbihop)
· Louisiana House 2Q Fundraising #'s (DailyKingFish)
· OR-SEN: Merkley's Netroots Nation video (karichisholm)
· AK-Sen: New Begich Ad (Matt Browner Hamlin)
· Not a Bad Cover for Obama in Colorado (Jonathan Singer)
· Chris Matthews: Open Up Your Hearts (Jonathan Singer)
· GOP Veepstakes ... Is It Jindal? (DailyKingFish)
· KY-3: Yarmuth(D) up 10 points on Northup(R) (MediaCzech)
· CO-04: Marilyn Musgrave's Waterloo? (em dash)